States push back against mRNA injections, announce bans on deadly shots

02/23/2025 / By Ava Grace

Kentucky, Montana and Idaho are spearheading efforts to ban or pause the use of mRNA vaccines, citing concerns over safety and long-term effects. Kentucky introduced a bill to ban human gene therapy products, including mRNA vaccines, until 2035, while Montana and Idaho are advancing similar legislation.
Critics argue that mRNA vaccines, which use synthetic genetic material to trigger immune responses, pose unknown long-term risks and have been linked to adverse events. Proponents, however, view the technology as a groundbreaking advancement for disease prevention and treatment.
Montana’s House Bill 371 proposes classifying mRNA vaccine administration as a misdemeanor with fines and license reviews, while Idaho’s Senate Bill 1036 seeks a 10-year moratorium on mRNA vaccines and gene-based therapies. Both bills reflect skepticism toward federal safety assurances.
Beyond state legislatures, counties like Boise and Washington in Idaho have passed resolutions advising against mRNA vaccines, particularly for children. Similar initiatives are emerging in Iowa, South Carolina, Texas and Washington.
The debate over mRNA vaccines is deeply political, with conservatives framing it as a fight for personal freedom and resistance to government overreach.

Three U.S. states – Kentucky, Montana and Idaho – are leading a nationwide push to ban or pause the use of mRNA vaccines.

The Bluegrass State introduced a bill that would ban the administration of any human gene therapy product until July 2035. Included in this 10-year ban are mRNA vaccines. But Kentucky isn’t alone in this pushback against the injections, as Montana and Idaho have followed suit.

In Montana, House Bill 371 seeks to classify the administration of mRNA vaccines as a misdemeanor punishable by a $500 fine per incident and a review of the offender’s professional license. State Rep. Greg Kmetz (R-District 36), the bill’s sponsor, argues that mRNA vaccines have caused “enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities and serious adverse events.”

Meanwhile, Idaho’s proposed Senate Bill 1036 would impose a 10-year moratorium on mRNA vaccines and other gene-based therapies similar to that of Kentucky’s. The measure is named after Doug Cameron, a rancher who reportedly suffered severe injuries after receiving a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.

State Sen. Brandon Shippy (R-District 9), the bill’s sponsor, emphasized the need for caution and transparency. “All gene therapy products being used for immunization should be put on hold until we can determine their safety and efficacy,” he remarked.

The push to ban mRNA vaccines is not limited to state legislatures, with grassroots efforts at the county level gaining momentum. Idaho’s Boise and Washington counties have passed resolutions advising against the use of mRNA vaccines, particularly for children. Similar initiatives are underway in Iowa, South Carolina, Texas and Washington, where local officials are considering resolutions to warn citizens about the potential dangers of these vaccines.

The dark side of mRNA vaccines, and why they should be banned

The mRNA vaccines, particularly those developed for COVID-19, pose significant risks to public health. The mRNA technology uses synthetic genetic material to instruct cells to produce a protein that triggers an immune response. Despite claims of these kinds of vaccines being “safe and effective,” reports of adverse events including severe injuries and deaths, show that these vaccines may not be as safe as claimed. (Related: mRNA vaccines are extremely toxic, Moderna scientists now warn.)

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher of the McCullough Foundation, a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines, believes these state and local efforts could force the federal government to reconsider its stance. He and others argue that the growing body of evidence linking mRNA vaccines to adverse events – including cancers, miscarriages and abnormal bleeding –warrants immediate action.

The debate over mRNA vaccines is not just a scientific or medical issue, it’s a deeply political one. The push to ban these vaccines is about reclaiming personal freedom and resisting government overreach. The federal government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic through mandates and coercive policies eroded public trust, making it difficult for many Americans to accept the safety claims surrounding mRNA vaccines.

Watch Dr. Robert Malone discussing the risks of mRNA vaccines, including cancer, in this clip.

This video is from The HighWire with Del Bigtree channel on Brighteon.com.