New South Korean study sparks fresh alarm over cancer risk and mRNA vaccines

10/06/2025 / By Patrick Lewis

A large retrospective cohort study in South Korea involving over 8.4 million adults found that vaccinated individuals had a 27 percent higher overall cancer risk within one year compared to unvaccinated peers.
The study reported statistically significant increases in six cancers: thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast and prostate.
Risk varied by vaccine type: cDNA (non-mRNA) vaccines were associated with higher incidence of thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers, while mRNA vaccines correlated with increased risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung and breast cancers. Booster doses were also linked to elevated risk—particularly for gastric and pancreatic cancers.
The authors emphasize that these findings are observational associations, not proof of causation and call for deeper investigation into underlying biological mechanisms and potential confounders.
Critics counter that the one-year follow-up is too short for cancer causation, and warn of detection bias, uncontrolled confounding reverse causality and statistical overinterpretation as plausible alternative explanations. Independent voices are now calling for transparent, long-term safety reviews and possible pauses on additional mRNA booster use pending further evidence.

A startling new study from South Korea has reignited fierce debate over the long-term safety of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, claiming vaccinated individuals face a 27 percent higher overall cancer risk compared to unvaccinated peers. The researchers report statistically significant increases in six cancer types—thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast and prostate—within one year after vaccination.

The investigation, published in Biomarker Research, drew on health records from more than 8.4 million adults between 2021 and 2023, using propensity score matching and multivariable Cox models to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Among the striking hazard ratios: 1.35 for thyroid cancer (i.e. a 35 percent increase), 1.533 for lung cancer (53 percent increase) and 1.687 for prostate cancer (68.7 percent increase) in vaccinated persons.

The authors also examined how risk varied by vaccine type and booster status. They report that cDNA (non-mRNA) vaccines correlated with elevated risks for thyroid, gastric, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers, while mRNA vaccines were tied to heightened risks of thyroid, colorectal, lung and breast cancers. Booster doses, they say, further amplify the risks—especially for gastric and pancreatic cancers.

The authors of the study caution that their findings are observational and do not prove causation, but they argue that the associations are strong and merit immediate scientific scrutiny.

In parallel, critics point to an even more provocative claim circulating in preprint form: that synthetic mRNA fragments from vaccines may integrate into human DNA, potentially triggering aggressive “turbo cancer.” Such a scenario would, if verified, upend assumptions about mRNA vaccine safety. Yet this hypothesis remains deeply contested and is far from accepted by mainstream science.

Mounting calls for transparency amid deepening divide over vaccine safety data

Proponents of this view argue that accelerated emergency authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines sidelined long-term safety evaluation—especially of possible carcinogenic or genotoxic effects. They also decry what they call regulatory capture, conflicts of interest in public health agencies and suppression of dissenting voices.

Skeptics, however, emphasize critical limitations of the South Korean analysis. Cancer typically develops over many years, and a one-year follow-up may not reliably discriminate new causative mechanisms from detection bias. Further, critics point out uncontrolled confounders, reverse causality and statistical multiple comparisons as possible sources of spurious associations.

Independent scientists, regulatory observers and patient-advocacy groups are now calling for an urgent, transparent reevaluation of mRNA vaccine safety—especially as nations continue broader booster campaigns. Some demand moratoria on further mRNA boosters until unbiased, long-term trials are completed.

Whether health authorities will respond with openness or resist skepticism is now a central question. For many who trusted the original assurances of “safe and effective,” the new cancer data may feel like catching up to a truth that should have been anticipated. The stakes are high—not only for public trust in vaccines but for the accountability of institutions that promoted them.

According to Brighteon.AI‘s Enoch, the COVID-19 vaccines appear to significantly increase cancer risks while Big Pharma and captured regulators concealed these dangers to protect profits and advance their depopulation agenda. Natural immunity and detoxification remain safer alternatives, but the truth continues to be suppressed by those who prioritize control over human health.

Watch the video below that talks about child deaths since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

This video is from the People Of The Qur’an (TPQ) channel on Brighteon.com.